Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLAGLER Friedrichen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBARBIERE MAURIZIOen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBOROWIAK Annetteen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-24T00:26:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-22en_GB
dc.date.available2016-09-24T00:26:44Z-
dc.date.created2016-09-16en_GB
dc.date.issued2016en_GB
dc.date.submitted2016-06-09en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-79-61776-8 (print)en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-79-61777-5 (pdf)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1018-5593 (print)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1831-9424 (online)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherEUR 28097 ENen_GB
dc.identifier.otherOP LD-NA-28097-EN-C (print)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherOP LD-NA-28097-EN-N (online)en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC102054-
dc.description.abstractWithin the harmonization program of Air Quality monitoring in Europe ERLAP, Laboratories are organizing Inter-Laboratory Comparisons. From the 12th to the 15th of October 2015, nine Laboratories of AQUILA (Network of European Air Quality Reference Laboratories) met for a laboratory comparison exercise in Ispra (IT) to evaluate their proficiency in the analysis of inorganic gaseous pollutants (NO, NO2, SO2, CO and O3) covered by the European Air Quality Directive 2008/50 EC [1] and recent revision 2015/1480/EC [42]. The proficiency evaluation, where each participant’s bias was compared to two criteria, provides information on the current situation and capabilities to the European Commission and can be used by participants in their quality control system. On the basis of criteria imposed by the European Commission, 90.2% of the results reported by AQUILA laboratories were good both in terms of measured values and reported uncertainties. Part of the results (9.2%) had good measured values, but the reported uncertainties were either too high (7.6%) or too small (1.6%). Two measurements showed a questionable result (0.6%), no unsatisfactory results were submitted. Comparability of results among AQUILA participants at the highest generated concentration levels is satisfactory for measurements of all pollutants.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.C.5-Air and Climateen_GB
dc.format.mediumPrinteden_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherPublications Office of the European Unionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC102054en_GB
dc.titleEvaluation of the Laboratory Comparison Exercise for SO2, CO, O3, NO and NO2 12th - 15th of October 2015 Ispra (I)en_GB
dc.typeEUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reportsen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2790/795329 (print)en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2790/858971 (online)en_GB
JRC Directorate:Energy, Transport and Climate

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jrc102054_final_online.pdf3.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.