Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Problems with the uncertainty Budget of Half-life Measurements|
|Publisher:||American Chemical Society|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||The apparent tendency to underestimate the uncertainty of experimentally determined half-life values of radionuclides is discussed. It is argued that the uncertainty derived from a least-squares analysis of a decay curve is prone to error, as it does no sufficiently account for systematic deviations and medium frequency instabilities. As it is quite common for a series of activity measurement results to be autocorrelated, the prerequisite of randomness of data for common statistical tests to apply is not fulfilled. In this work, an attempt is made to provide a alternative data analysis method that leads to a complete and realistic uncertainty budget. A procedure is presented in which experimental uncertainties are subdivided into categories according to the rate at which they occur; i.e. at a low, medium or high frequency. All uncertainty components should be reported for traceability and evaluation purposes|
|JRC Institute:||Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.