Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Migratory Birds, the H5N1 Influenza Virus and the Scientific Method|
|Authors:||WEBER THOMAS; STILIANAKIS NIKOLAOS|
|Citation:||VIROLOGY JOURNAL vol. 5 p. 57-1; 57-3|
|Publisher:||BIOMED CENTRAL LTD|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Background: The role of migratory birds and of poultry trade in the dispersal of highly pathogenic H5N1 is still the topic of intense and controversial debate. In a recent contribution to this journal, Flint argues that the strict application of the scientific method can help to resolve this issue. Discussion: We argue that Flint¿s identification of the scientific method with null hypothesis testing is misleading and counterproductive. There is far more to science than the testing of hypotheses; not only the justification, bur also the discovery of hypotheses belong to science. We also show why null hypothesis testing is weak and that Bayesian methods are a preferable approach to statistical inference. Furthermore, we criticize the analogy put forward by Flint between involuntary transport of poultry and long-distance migration. Summary: To expect ultimate answers and unequivocal policy guidance from null hypothesis testing puts unrealistic expectations on a flawed approach to statistical inference and on science in general.|
|JRC Institute:||Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.