Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Maybe Survival Means Sacrificing our Freedom of Choice|
|Citation:||Europe's World p. 139-143|
|Type:||Articles in Journals|
|Abstract:||The paper is an invited comment to a paper of Lord Martin Rees, presindent of the Royal Society, which has as a title "Why the end of the world might be nigh" . I argue that many indicators show that the world seems to be on an explosive track: global population growth, greenhouse gas emissions, depletion of natural resources, the world has become less stable because less complex. Whereas before a myriad of slow and self-controlling processes stabilized the world, today a few fast operating and often mutually reinforcing processes dominate: the North-South divide, military hegemony, fossil fuel use, technological development. With less complexity the world has become inherently less stable and a careful management, based on continuous observation, understanding and adjustments is now required. A major question however arises: How much control of the Earth-Man system is compatible with how much freedom and democracy? Is a trade-off acceptable or even needed?|
|JRC Institute:||Institute for Environment and Sustainability|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.