Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Description of Nine Nutrient Loss Models: Capabilities and Suitability Based on Their Characteristics|
|Authors:||SCHOUMANS O.; SILGRAM M.; GROENENDIJK P.; BOURAOUI Faycal; ANDERSEN H.; KRONVANG B.; ARHEIMER B.; JOHNSSON H.; PANAGOPOULOS Y.; MIMIKOU M.; LO PORTO A.; REISSER H.; LE GALL G.; BARR A.; ANTHONY S.g.|
|Citation:||JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING vol. 11 no. 3 p. 506-514|
|Publisher:||ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||In EUROHARP, an EC Framework V project, which started in 2002 with 21 partners in 17 countries across Europe, a detailed intercomparison of contemporary catchment-scale modelling approaches was undertaken to characterise the relative importance of point and diffuse pollution of nutrients in surface freshwater systems. The study focused on the scientific evaluation of different modelling approaches, which were validated on three core catchments (the Ouse, UK; the Vansjo-Hobøl, Norway; and the Enza, Italy), and the application of each tool to three additional, randomly chosen catchments across Europe. The tools involved differ profoundly in their complexity, level of process representation and data requirements. The tools include simple loading models, statistical, conceptual and empirical model approaches, and physics-based (mechanistic) models. The results of a scientific intercomparison of the characteristics of these different model approaches are described. This includes an analysis of potential strengths and weaknesses of the nutrient models.|
|JRC Institute:||Sustainable Resources|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.