Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Effect of Chlorophyll Sampling Design on Water Quality Assessment in Thermally Stratified Lakes|
|Authors:||NOGES Peeter; POIKANE Sandra; KOIV Toomas; NOGES Tiina|
|Citation:||HYDROBIOLOGIA vol. 649 no. 1 p. 157-170|
|JRC Publication N°:||JRC56355|
|Type:||Articles in Journals|
|Abstract:||In order to adequately assess the ecological status of thermally stratified lakes based on chlorophyll, the sampling must cover all productive layers of the water column. Missing the deep chlorophyll maxima (DCM) that often occur in the meta- or hypolimnion of transparent lakes supported by sufficient illumination and good nutrient availability, may cause serious underestimation of the productivity and lead to misclassification of the lake ecological status. There is no commonly accepted sampling design for stratified lakes and various monitoring guides suggest controversial designs. Our aim was to find some robust criteria to assess the probability of occurrence of a DCM and estimate the differences in measured mean chlorophyll concentrations caused by various sampling designs. Our theoretical model showed that the probability of occurrence of a DCM increases with increasing water transparency and decreasing lake size. Empirical data from Italian and Estonian stratified lakes confirmed the results. Testing of different sampling designs on lakes with full measured chlorophyll profiles available showed that taking only surface layer samples will lead with a high probability to an underestimation of the chlorophyll concentration in the trophogenic layer. In order not to miss the Chl peak in stratified lakes, in most cases it would be more precautious not to limit the sampling with the well-mixed epilimnion but to extend it to the euphotic layer. Sampling epilimnion instead of euphotic zone could cause up to 70% underestimation of Chl concentration, an error that would cause a misclassification of the lake by one or even two status classes in a 5-class assessment system. In most cases, the 2.5*Secchi depths proved a suitable criterion of the sampling depth and only in case of surface scums, sampling of a 3*Secchi depth layer would be recommended in order to not miss the deep chlorophyll maximum.|
|JRC Institute:||Institute for Environment and Sustainability|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.