Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Revisiting the Concept of HTR Wallpaper Fuel|
|Authors:||MARMIER Alain; FUETTERER Michael; TUCEK Kamil; DE HAAS Han; KUIJPER Jim C.; KLOOSTERMAN Jan Leen|
|Citation:||NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN vol. 240 no. 10 p. 2485-2492|
|Publisher:||ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA|
|Type:||Articles in Journals|
|Abstract:||As early as the 1970s, attempts were made to reduce the peak fuel temperature by means of so-called "wallpaper fuel", in which the fuel is arranged in a spherical shell within a pebble: By raising particle packing fraction, fuel kernels are condensed to the outer diameter of the fuel zone, leaving a central part of the pebble free of fuel. This modification prevents power generation in this central fuel-free zone and decreases temperature gradient across the pebble. Besides particle temperature reduction, the wallpaper concept also enhances neutronic performance through improved neutron economy, resulting in reduced fissile material and/or enrichment needs or providing the potential to achieve higher burn-up. To assess such improvements, calculations were performed using Monte Carlo neutron transport and depletion codes MCNP/MCB. Among others, investigations of conversion ratio, temperature coefficient of reactivity, spent fuel composition and neutron multiplication (for which a method to determine the six-factor formula was developed), were conducted. It is demonstrated that this fuel type impacts positively on the fuel cycle, reduces production of minor actinides (MA) and improves the safety-relevant parameters of the reactor. A comparison of these characteristics with PBMR-type fuel is presented: By comparison with PBMR fuel, the "wallpaper design" results in an effective neutron multiplication coefficient increase (by about 1750 pcm), which is combined with a decrease of between 4.6 and 17.5% in MA production. An improved neutron economy of the heterogeneous design enables enrichment of the ¿wallpaper type¿ of fuel to be reduced by more than 6%. The fuel changes suggested in this paper offer more versatility to the HTR concept: Conversion ratio can be decreased (leading to lower MA build-up and fuel reprocessing cost) or raised (leading to lower fuel consumption and fuel cost). Variations around this concept also enable higher reactivity, thus higher achievable burn-up, improving sustainability of HTRs.|
|JRC Institute:||Institute for Energy and Transport|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.