Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis|
|Authors:||RICHARDSON Andrew D.; ANDERSON Ryan S.; ARAIN Altaf M.; BARR Alan G.; BOHRER Gil; CHEN Guangsheng; CHEN Jing M.; CIAIS Philippe; DAVIS Kenneth J.; DESAI Ankur R.; DIETZE Michael C.; DRAGONI Danilo; GARRITY Steven; GOUGH C.m.; GRANT Robert; HOLLINGER David Y.; MARGOLIS Hank; MCCAUGHEY Harry; MIGLIAVACCA MIRCO; MONSON Russel K.; MUNGER William J; POULTER Benjamin; RACZKA Brett M.; RICCIUTO Daniel; SAHOO Alok K.; SCHAEFER Kevin; TIAN Hanqin; VARGAS Rodrigo; VERBEECK H.; XIAO Jingfeng; XUE Yongkang|
|Citation:||GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY vol. 18 no. 2 p. 566-584|
|Type:||Articles in Journals|
|Abstract:||Phenology, by controlling the seasonal activity of vegetation on the land surface, plays a fundamental role in regulating photosynthesis and other ecosystem processes, as well as competitive interactions and feedbacks to the climate system. We conducted an analysis to evaluate the representation of phenology, and the associated seasonality of ecosystem-scale CO2 exchange, in 14 models participating in the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis. Model predictions were evaluated using long-term measurements (emphasizing the period 2000-2006) from 10 forested sites within the AmeriFlux and Fluxnet-Canada networks. In deciduous forests, almost all models consistently predicted that the growing season started earlier, and ended later, than was actually observed; biases of 2 weeks or more were typical. For these sites, most models were also unable to explain more than a small fraction of the observed interannual variability in phenological transition dates. Finally, for deciduous forests, misrepresentation of the seasonal cycle resulted in over-prediction of gross ecosystem photosynthesis by +160 ± 145 g C m−2 y−1 during the spring transition period, and +75 ± 130 g C m−2 y−1 during the autumn transition period (13% and 8% annual productivity, respectively) compensating for the tendency of most models to under-predict the magnitude of peak summertime photosynthetic rates. Models did a better job of predicting the seasonality of CO2 exchange for evergreen forests. These results highlight the need for improved understanding of the environmental controls on vegetation phenology, and incorporation of this knowledge into better phenological models. Existing models are unlikely to predict future responses of phenology to climate change accurately, and therefore will misrepresent the seasonality and interannual variability of key biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks and interactions in coupled global climate models.|
|JRC Institute:||Institute for Environment and Sustainability|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.