Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs|
|Authors:||ARMSWORTH Paul R.; ACS SZVETLANA; DALLIMER Martin; GASTON Kevin J.; HANLEY Nick; WILSON Paul|
|Citation:||ECOLOGY LETTERS ONLINE vol. 15 no. 5 p. 406 - 414|
|Publisher:||JOHN WILEY AND SONS|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Incentive payments to private landowners provide a common strategy to conserve biodiversity and enhance the supply of goods and services from ecosystems. To deliver cost-effective improvements in biodiversity, payment schemes must trade-off inefficiencies that result from over-simplified policies with the administrative burden of implementing more complex incentive designs. We examine the effectiveness of different payment schemes using field parameterized, ecological economic models of extensive grazing farms. We focus on profit maximising farm management plans and use bird species as a policy-relevant indicator of biodiversity. Common policy simplifications result in a 49–100% loss in biodiversity benefits depending on the conservation target chosen. Failure to differentiate prices for conservation improvements in space is particularly problematic. Additional implementation costs that accompany more complicated policies are worth bearing even when these constitute a substantial proportion (70% or more) of the payments that would otherwise have been given to farmers.|
|JRC Institute:||Growth and Innovation|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.