Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Advocacy, analysis and quality. The Bermuda triangle of Statistics|
|Other Contributors:||SALTELLI Andrea|
|Citation:||Proceedings 59th ISI World Statistics Congress, 25-30 August 2013, Hong Kong (Session STS023) vol. STS023 p. 1547-1549|
|Publisher:||International Statistical Institute|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||One might muse that what official statistics are to the consolidation of the modern nation state, composite indicators are to the emergence of post-modernity, – meaning by this the philosophical critique of the exact science and rational knowledge programme of Descartes and Galileo. Composite indicators give voice to a plurality of different actors and normative views of post-modernity. Not only has the use of composite indicators increased dramatically over the past ten to fifteen years, but the typology of use has widened. To make a recent example of a hitherto unheard use, in 2012 Bill Emmott, former Director of The Economist, used a battery of composite indicators, with a well dramatized presentational style, to describe the decline of a country, and this in a movie seen by millions of viewers. We consider composite indicators as an object populating a multidimensional space whose main axes are advocacy, analysis and quality. We review these issues and try to offer some elements of an epistemology of composite indicators.|
|JRC Directorate:||Joint Research Centre Corporate Activities|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.