Title: A new global fAPAR and LAI dataset derived from optimal albedo estimates: comparison with MODIS products
Authors: DISNEY MathiasMULLER Jan-PeterKHARBOUCHE SaidKAMINSKI ThomasVOSSBECK MichaelLEWIS P.PINTY Bernard
Citation: REMOTE SENSING vol. 8 no. 4 p. 275
Publisher: MDPI AG
Publication Year: 2016
JRC N°: JRC100908
ISSN: 2072-4292
URI: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/4/275
http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC100908
DOI: 10.3390/rs8040275
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: We present the first comparison between new fAPAR and LAI products derived from the GlobAlbedo dataset and the widely-used MODIS fAPAR and LAI and products. The GlobAlbedo derived products are produced using a 1D two-stream radiative transfer (RT) scheme designed explicitly for global parameter retrieval from albedo, with consistency between RT model assumptions and observations, as well as with typical large-scale land surface model RT schemes. The approach does not require biome-specific structural assumptions (e.g. cover, clumping, understory), unlike more detailed 3D RT model approaches. GlobAlbedo-derived values of fAPAR and LAI are compared with MODIS values over 2002-2011 at multiple flux tower sites within selected biomes, over 1200 × 1200 km regions and globally. GlobAlbedo-derived fAPAR and LAI values are temporally more stable than the MODIS values due to (1) the smoothness of the underlying albedo, derived via optimal estimation (assimilation) using an a priori estimate of albedo derived from an albedo ‘climatology’ (composited multi-year albedo observations) and (2) space-time invariant prior information in the inversion of the two-stream RT scheme. Parameters agree closely in timing but with GlobAlbedo values consistently lower than MODIS, particularly for LAI. Larger differences occur in winter (when values are lower) and in the Southern hemisphere. Globally, we find that: GlobAlbedo-derived fAPAR is ~0.9- 1.01 × MODIS fAPAR with an offset of ~0.03; GlobAlbedo-derived LAI is ~0.6 × MODIS LAI with an offset of ~0.2. Differences arise due to the RT model assumptions underlying the products, meaning care is required in interpreting either set of values, particularly when comparing to finescale ground-based estimates. We present global calibrations between GlobAlbedo-derived and MODIS products.
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.