Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMERONI MICHELEen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSCHUCKNECHT ANNEen_GB
dc.contributor.authorFASBENDER DOMINIQUEen_GB
dc.contributor.authorREMBOLD Felixen_GB
dc.contributor.authorFAVA Francescoen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMAUCLAIRE Margauxen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGOFFNER Deborahen_GB
dc.contributor.authorDI LUCCHIO LUISAen_GB
dc.contributor.authorLEONARDI Ugoen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-08T00:28:37Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-06en_GB
dc.date.available2017-04-08T00:28:37Z-
dc.date.created2017-03-29en_GB
dc.date.issued2017en_GB
dc.date.submitted2016-11-02en_GB
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION vol. 59 p. 42-52en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0303-2434en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303243417300429en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC103713-
dc.description.abstractRestoration interventions to combat land degradation are carried out in arid and semi-arid areas to improve vegetation cover and land productivity. Evaluating the success of an intervention over time is challenging due to various constraints (e.g. difficult-to-access areas, lack of long-term records) and the lack of standardised and affordable methodologies. We propose a semi-automatic methodology that uses remote sensing data to provide a rapid, standardised and objective assessment of the biophysical impact, in terms of vegetation cover, of restoration interventions. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is used as a proxy for vegetation cover. Recognising that changes in vegetation cover are naturally due to environmental factors such as the inter-annual climate variability and the seasonal vegetation development cycle, conclusions about the success of the intervention cannot be drawn by focussing on the intervention area only. We therefore use a comparative method that analyses the temporal variations (before and after the intervention) of the NDVI of the intervention area with respect to multiple control sites that are automatically and randomly selected from a set of candidates that are similar to the intervention area. Similarity is defined in terms of class composition as derived from an ISODATA classification of the imagery before the intervention. The method provides an estimate of the magnitude of the differential change in the intervention area and the statistical significance of the no-change hypothesis test. As a case study, the methodology is applied to 15 restoration interventions carried out within the framework of the Great Green Wall for the Sahara and the Sahel Initiative in Senegal. The impact of the interventions is analysed using data at two different resolutions: 250 m for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and 30 m for the Landsat mission. Results show that a significant improvement in vegetation cover was detectable only in one third of analysed interventions, which is consistent with independent qualitative assessments based on field observations and visual analysis of high resolution imagery. The pros and cons of using the two data sources are discussed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.D.5-Food Securityen_GB
dc.format.mediumPrinteden_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC103713en_GB
dc.titleRemote sensing monitoring of land restoration interventions in semi-arid environments with a before–after control-impact statistical designen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jag.2017.02.016en_GB
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.