Title: Inverse modelling of European CH4 emissions during 2006-2012 using different inverse models and reassessed atmospheric observations
Authors: BERGAMASCHI PETERKARSTENS U.MANNING A.SAUNOIS MARIELLETSURUTA AKIBERCHET A.VERMEULEN ALEXARNOLD T.JANSSENS-MAENHOUT GREETHAMMER SAMUELLEVIN INGEBORGSCHMIDT MARTINARAMONET MICHELLOPEZ M.LAVRIC JOST VALENTINAALTO T.CHEN HUILINFEIST DGERBIG CHRISTOPHHASZPRA L.HERMANSEN OVEMANCA GIOVANNIMONCRIEFF J.MEINHARDT FRANKNECKI J.GALKOWSKI M.O'DOHERTY SIMONPARAMONOVA NINASCHEEREN HUBERTUS A.STEINBACHER M.DLUGOKENCKY E.
Citation: ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS vol. 18 p. 901-920
Publisher: COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
Publication Year: 2018
JRC N°: JRC105763
ISSN: 1680-7316
URI: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC105763
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-901-2018
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: We present inverse modelling (top down) estimates of European methane (CH4) emissions for 2006–2012 based on a new quality-controlled and harmonised in situ data set from 18 European atmospheric monitoring stations. We applied an ensemble of seven inverse models and performed four inversion experiments, investigating the impact of different sets of stations and the use of a priori information on emissions. The inverse models infer total CH4 emissions of 26.8 (20.2–29.7) TgCH4 yr-1 (mean, 10th and 90th percentiles from all inversions) for the EU-28 for 2006–2012 from the four inversion experiments. For comparison, total anthropogenic CH4 emissions reported to UNFCCC (bottom up, based on statistical data and emissions factors) amount to only 21.3 TgCH4 yr-1 (2006) to 18.8 TgCH4 yr-1 (2012). A potential explanation for the higher range of top-down estimates compared to bottom-up inventories could be the contribution from natural sources, such as peatlands, wetlands, and wet soils. Based on seven different wetland inventories from the Wetland and Wetland CH4 Inter-comparison of Models Project (WETCHIMP), total wetland emissions of 4.3 (2.3–8.2) TgCH4 yr-1 from the EU-28 are estimated. The hypothesis of significant natural emissions is supported by the finding that several inverse models yield significant seasonal cycles of derived CH4 emissions with maxima in summer, while anthropogenic CH4 emissions are assumed to have much lower seasonal variability. Taking into account the wetland emissions from the WETCHIMP ensemble, the top-down estimates are broadly consistent with the sum of anthropogenic and natural bottom-up inventories. However, the contribution of natural sources and their regional distribution remain rather uncertain. Furthermore, we investigate potential biases in the inverse models by comparison with regular aircraft profiles at four European sites and with vertical profiles obtained during the Infrastructure for Measurement of the European Carbon Cycle (IMECC) aircraft campaign.We present a novel approach to estimate the biases in the derived emissions, based on the comparison of simulated and measured enhancements of CH4 compared to the background, integrated over the entire boundary layer and over the lower troposphere. The estimated average regional biases range between -40 and 20% at the aircraft profile sites in France, Hungary and Poland.
JRC Directorate:Energy, Transport and Climate

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.