Title: Assessment of the Methodology for Establishing the EU List of Critical Raw Materials - Annexes
Authors: BLENGINI GIOVANNIBLAGOEVA DARINADEWULF JOTORRES DE MATOS CRISTINANITA VIORELVIDAL LEGAZ BEATRIZLATUNUSSA CYNTHIAKAYAM YILDIRIMTALENS PEIRO LAURABARANZELLI CLAUDIAMANFREDI SIMONEMANCINI LUCIANUSS PHILIPMARMIER ALAINALVES DIAS PATRICIAPAVEL CLAUDIUTZIMAS EVANGELOSMATHIEUX FABRICEPENNINGTON DAVIDCIUPAGEA CONSTANTIN
Publisher: Publications Office of the European Union
Publication Year: 2017
JRC N°: JRC107008
ISBN: 978-92-79-70213-6
ISSN: 1831-9424
Other Identifiers: EUR 28654 EN
OP KJ-NB-28654-EN-N
URI: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107008
DOI: 10.2760/875135
Type: EUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reports
Abstract: This report presents the results of work carried out by the Directorate General (DG) Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC), in close cooperation with Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (GROW), in the context of the revision of the EC methodology that was used to identify the list of critical raw materials (CRMs) for the EU in 2011 and 2014 (EC 2011, 2014). As a background report, it complements the corresponding Guidelines Document, which contains the “ready-to-apply” methodology for updating the list of CRMs in 2017. This background report highlights the needs for updating the EC criticality methodology, the analysis and the proposals for improvement with related examples, discussion and justifications. However, a few initial remarks are necessary to clarify the context, the objectives of the revision and the approach. As the in-house scientific service of the EC, DG JRC was asked to provide scientific advice to DG GROW in order to assess the current methodology, identify aspects that have to be adapted to better address the needs and expectations of the list of CRMs and ultimately propose an improved and integrated methodology. This work was conducted closely in consultation with the adhoc working group on CRMs, who participated in regular discussions and provided informed expert feedback. The analysis and subsequent revision started from the assumption that the methodology used for the 2011 and 2014 CRMs lists proved to be reliable and robust and, therefore, the JRC mandate was focused on fine-tuning and/or targeted incremental methodological improvements. An in depth re-discussion of fundamentals of criticality assessment and/or major changes to the EC methodology were not within the scope of this work. High priority was given to ensure good comparability with the criticality exercises of 2011 and 2014. The existing methodology was therefore retained, except for specific aspects for which there were policy and/or stakeholder needs on the one hand, or strong scientific reasons for refinement of the methodology on the other. This was partially facilitated through intensive dialogue with DG GROW, the CRM adhoc working group, other key EU and extra-EU stakeholders.
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
kjnb28654enn.pdf3.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.