Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5°C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment|
|Authors:||VRONTISI ZOI; LUDERER GUNNAR; SAVEYN BERT; KERAMIDAS KIMON; ALELUIA REIS LARA; BAUMSTARK LAVINIA; BERTRAM CHRISTOPH; DE BOER HARMEN SYTZE; DROUET LAURENT; FRAGKIADAKIS KOSTAS; FRICKO OLIVIER; FUJIMORI SHINICHIRO; GUIVARCH CELINE; KITOUS ALBAN GABRIEL; KREY VOLKER; KRIEGLER ELMAR; Ó BROIN EOIN; PAROUSSOS LEONIDAS; VAN VUUREN DETLEF|
|Citation:||ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS vol. 13 no. 4 p. 044039|
|Publisher:||IOP PUBLISHING LTD|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||The Paris Agreement is a milestone in international climate policy as it establishes a global mitigation framework towards 2030 and sets the ground for a potential 1.5 °C climate stabilization. To provide useful insights for the 2018 UNFCCC Talanoa facilitative dialogue, we use eight state-of-the-art climate-energy-economy models to assess the effectiveness of the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) in meeting high probability 1.5 and 2 °C stabilization goals. We estimate that the implementation of conditional INDCs in 2030 leaves an emissions gap from least cost 2 °C and 1.5 °C pathways for year 2030 equal to 15.6 (9.0–20.3) and 24.6 (18.5–29.0) GtCO2eq respectively. The immediate transition to a more efficient and low-carbon energy system is key to achieving the Paris goals. The decarbonization of the power supply sector delivers half of total CO2 emission reductions in all scenarios, primarily through high penetration of renewables and energy efficiency improvements. In combination with an increased electrification of final energy demand, low-carbon power supply is the main short-term abatement option. We find that the global macroeconomic cost of mitigation efforts does not reduce the 2020–2030 annual GDP growth rates in any model more than 0.1 percentage points in the INDC or 0.3 and 0.5 in the 2 °C and 1.5 °C scenarios respectively even without accounting for potential co-benefits and avoided climate damages. Accordingly, the median GDP reductions across all models in 2030 are 0.4%, 1.2% and 3.3% of reference GDP for each respective scenario. Costs go up with increasing mitigation efforts but a fragmented action, as implied by the INDCs, results in higher costs per unit of abated emissions. On a regional level, the cost distribution is different across scenarios while fossil fuel exporters see the highest GDP reductions in all INDC, 2 °C and 1.5 °C scenarios.|
|JRC Directorate:||Energy, Transport and Climate|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.