Title: Understanding epistemic uncertainty in large-scale coastal flood risk estimates for present and future climates
Authors: VOUSDOUKAS MICHAILBOUZIOTAS DIMITRIOSGIARDINO ALESSIOBOUWER LAURENSMENTASCHI LORENZOFEYEN LUC
Citation: NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES vol. 18 no. 8 p. 2127-2142
Publisher: COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
Publication Year: 2018
JRC N°: JRC111499
ISSN: 1561-8633 (online)
URI: https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/18/2127/2018/
http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC111499
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-18-2127-2018
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: An upscaling of flood risk assessment frameworks beyond regional and national scales has taken place during recent years, with a number of large-scale models emerging as tools for hotspot identification, support for international policy-making and harmonization of climate change adaptation strategies. There is, however, limited insight on the scaling 10 effects and structural limitations of flood risk models and, therefore, the underlying uncertainty. In light of this, we examine key sources of epistemic uncertainty in the Coastal Flood Risk (CFR) modelling chain: (i) the inclusion and interaction of different hydraulic components leading to extreme sea-level (ESL); (ii) inundation modelling; (iii) the underlying uncertainty in the Digital Elevation Model (DEM); (iv) flood defence information; (v) the assumptions behind the use of depth-damage functions that express vulnerability; and (vi) different climate change projections. The impact of these uncertainties to 15 estimated Expected Annual Damage (EAD) for present and future climates is evaluated in a dual case study in Faro, Portugal and in the Iberian Peninsula. The ranking of the uncertainty factors varies among the different case studies, baseline CFR estimates, as well as their absolute/relative changes. We find that uncertainty from ESL contributions, and in particular the way waves are treated, can be higher than the uncertainty of the two greenhouse gas emission projections and six climate models that are used. Of comparable importance is the quality of information on coastal protection levels and DEM 20 information. In the absence of large-extent datasets with sufficient resolution and accuracy the latter two factors are the main bottlenecks in terms of large-scale CFR assessment quality.
JRC Directorate:Space, Security and Migration

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.