A new standard is currently being developed under the auspices of ECISS/TC 101 WG1 for the small punch testing technique for the estimation of both tensile and creep properties. Annex G of the new standard is covering the assessment and evaluation of small punch creep (SPC) data. The main challenge for estimating uniaxial creep properties from SPC data is the force to equivalent stress conversion between SPC and uniaxial creep tests. In this work a range of SPC assessment methodologies, benchmarked for the standard, are compared for verifying the best practice used in the standard. The estimated equivalent stresses for SPC are compared to uniaxial creep stresses at equal rupture times, using three alternative models. In-depth analyses are performed on SPC and uniaxial creep data for P92, F92 and 316L steel tested within an inter-laboratory round robin. The formulation for SPC equivalent creep strain rate in the standard is also assessed.
HOLMSTROM Bjorn;
LI Yingzhi;
DYMACEK Petr;
VACCIERI E;
JEFFS Spencer;
LANCASTER Robert;
OMACHT Daniel;
KUBON Z;
ANELLI Ettore;
RANTALA Juhani;
TONTI Andrea;
KOMAZAKI Shin-Ichi;
NARVEENA " ";
BRUCHHAUSEN Matthias;
HURST Roger Christopher;
HAEHNER Peter;
RICHARDSON Mark;
ANDRES David;
2018-10-02
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
JRC112012
0921-5093 (online),
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC112012,
10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.005 (online),
This document is only visible at the Commission level.
You are not authorized to publish or distribute it outside the European Commission.
This is a public document. You can share this publication.
Additional supporting files
| File name | Description | File type | |
|---|
