Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A reply to the rebuttal by Sturrock et al.|
|Authors:||POMME STEFAAN; LUTTER GUILLAUME; MAROULI MARIA; KOSSERT KARSTEN; NAEHLE O.|
|Citation:||ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS vol. 107 p. 22-25|
|Publisher:||ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Sturrock et al. have published a "rebuttal" to a paper by Pommé et al. who refuted their claim that variations in a radon decay experiment at the Geological Survey of Israel (GSI) can be associated with solar rotation. Sturrock et al. misinterpret the variability of the decay rates in the gamma counter to assert influences by solar and cosmic neutrinos on beta decay and draw unsubstantiated conclusions about solar dynamics. Evidence suggests that the radon measurements were susceptible to solar irradiance and rainfall, whereas there is no indication that radioactive decay is influenced by the solar neutrino flux. In this reply to the rebuttal, the arguments raised by Sturrock et al. are scrutinised.|
|JRC Directorate:||Nuclear Safety and Security|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.