Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorENGLUND OSKARen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBÖRJESSONC PALen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBERNDES GORANen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSCARLAT NICOLAEen_GB
dc.contributor.authorDALLEMAND JEAN-FRANCOISen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGRIZZETTI BRUNAen_GB
dc.contributor.authorDIMITRIOU IOANNISen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMOLA-YUDEGO BLASen_GB
dc.contributor.authorFAHL FERNANDOen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T01:05:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-13en_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-14T01:05:06Z-
dc.date.created2020-01-10en_GB
dc.date.issued2020en_GB
dc.date.submitted2018-10-22en_GB
dc.identifier.citationGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS vol. 60 p. 101990en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0959-3780 (online)en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC113625-
dc.description.abstractSociety faces the double challenge of increasing biomass production to meet the future demands for food, materials and bioenergy, while addressing negative impacts of current (and future) land use. In the discourse, land use change (LUC) has often been considered as negative, referring to impacts of deforestation and expansion of biomass plantations. However, strategic establishment of suitable perennial production systems in agricultural landscapes can mitigate environmental impacts of current crop production, while providing biomass for the bioeconomy. Here, we explore the potential for such “beneficial LUC” in EU28. First, we map and quantify the degree of accumulated soil organic carbon losses, soil loss by wind and water erosion, nitrogen emissions to water, and recurring floods, in ∼81.000 individual landscapes in EU28. We then estimate the effectiveness in mitigating these impacts through establishment of perennial plants, in each landscape. The results indicate that there is a substantial potential for effective impact mitigation. Depending on criteria selection, 10–46% of the land used for annual crop production in EU28 is located in landscapes that could be considered priority areas for beneficial LUC. These areas are scattered all over Europe, but there are notable “hot-spots” where priority areas are concentrated, e.g., large parts of Denmark, western UK, The Po valley in Italy, and the Danube basin. While some policy developments support beneficial LUC, implementation could benefit from attempts to realize synergies between different Sustainable Development Goals, e.g., “Zero hunger”, “Clean water and sanitation”, “Affordable and Clean Energy”, “Climate Action”, and “Life on Land”.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.C.2-Energy Efficiency and Renewablesen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC113625en_GB
dc.titleBeneficial land use change: Strategic expansion of new biomass plantations can reduce environmental impacts from EU agricultureen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101990 (online)en_GB
JRC Directorate:Energy, Transport and Climate

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.