Title: Assessing the environmental impacts of EU consumption at macro-scale
Authors: BEYLOT ANTOINESECCHI MICHELACERUTTI ALESSANDROSTEFANO MERCIASCHMIDT JANNICKSALA SERENELLA
Citation: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION vol. 216 p. 382-393
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Publication Year: 2019
JRC N°: JRC115227
ISSN: 0959-6526 (online)
URI: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619301519
http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC115227
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.134
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: Sustainable Consumption and Production is considered a leading principle towards reducing environmental impacts globally. This study aims at combining Environmentally-Extended Input-Output Analysis (using EXIOBASE 3) with up-to-date impact assessment methods to quantify the environmental impacts induced by final consumption in the EU Member States in 2011. The environmental extensions are characterized in 14 environmental impact categories used in the Environmental Footprint. A contribution analysis of key products and services as well as emissions and resources, which drive the environmental impacts of EU consumption, is conducted. Environmental impacts are mainly induced along the supply-chain of products and services. Several expenditures relative to services represent large shares both in the total final consumption and in the 14 impacts under study, despite a relatively low impact intensity. Food products, in particular meat and dairy products, are identified as key contributors regarding acidification, eutrophication, land use and water use, and to a lower extent climate change. Finally, several manufactured products, raw materials and basic products respectively importantly contribute to some impacts among human toxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity and resource uses. The total volume of final consumption expenditures per EU Member State appears a key explanatory variable to most of the impacts embodied in their consumption, yet to a lower extent regarding water use and fossils resource use. Finally, the current limitations in using EXIOBASE 3 for environmental impact assessment are discussed, with specific attention to EXIOBASE environmental extensions and to the case study on EU consumption. Since the classification of emissions and resources for impact assessment requires a number of assumptions that may influence the results, a sensitivity analysis is performed to exemplify some of the key issues relative to the characterization of impacts based on EXIOBASE environmental extensions.
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.