Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Using REACH for the EU Environmental Footprint: building a usable ecotoxicity database, Part I|
|Authors:||SAOUTER ERWAN; BIGANZOLI FABRIZIO; PANT RANA; SALA SERENELLA; VERSTEEG DONALD|
|Citation:||INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT vol. 15 no. 5 p. 783-795|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||The European Union Environmental Footprint (EU‐EF) is a harmonized method to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organizations. Among 16 different impact categories included in the EU‐EF, 1 focuses on the impact of substances on freshwater ecosystems and requires the use of toxicity data. This paper evaluates the use of the aquatic toxicity data submitted to the EU Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation.It presents an automated computerized approachfor selecting substance ecotoxicity values, building on a set of quality and reliability criteria to extract the most relevant data points for calculating the substance speciﬁc hazard values. A selected set of criteria led to the exclusion of approximately 82% of the original REACH ecotoxicological data available as of May 2015 due to incomplete initial encoding of the data by the REACH registrant, missing information such as duration of exposure, endpoint measured, species tested, and imprecise toxicity values (i.e., reported with greater than or less than signs). From an initial set of 305068 ecotoxicity data records available in the REACH database, the ﬁnal usable database contains 54 353 toxicityrecords (29421 characterized asacute and 24941 aschronic)covering 9 taxonomic groups,withalgae, crustaceans, and ﬁsh representing 93% of the data. This data set is valuable for assessing the environmental toxicity of the substance contained whether through traditional substance risk assessment, product toxicity labeling, life cycle assessment (LCA) or environmental impact assessment approaches. However, the resulting loss of approximately 82% of the data suggests that changes in procedures used to generate, report, and document the data within REACH are needed to improve data utility for the various assessment approaches. The rules used to select the data to be used are the primary focus of this article. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:783–795. © 2019 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)|
|JRC Directorate:||Sustainable Resources|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.