Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Differences between tailpipe and dilution tunnel sub-23 nm non-volatile (solid) particle number measurements|
|Citation:||AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY vol. 53 no. 9 p. 1012-1022|
|Publisher:||TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||European Union vehicle and engine regulations require measurement of non-volatile (solid) particles with diameter >23 nm at the dilution tunnel. In 2019 it was decided to include particles >10 nm in the post Euro 6/VI regulations. Recent studies showed that sub-23 nm measurements are not only susceptible to volatile artifacts (i.e. re-nucleation downstream of the evaporation tube of the Particle Number system) but also to non-volatile artifacts (i.e. non-volatile particles formed in the tubing between the vehicle and the particle number system or in the particle number system itself). In order to investigate the origin of the non-volatile particle formation, steady-state tests with a moped, a compressed natural gas (CNG) and a diesel vehicle while regenerating were conducted. Systems at the tailpipe and the dilution tunnel with evaporation tubes or catalytic strippers and condensation particle counters (CPCs) with 50% detection efficiencies at 2.5 nm, 4 nm, 10 nm, and 23 nm were used. The results showed higher concentrations of sub-23 nm particles at the dilution tunnel than at the tailpipe when the facility preconditioning was not appropriate, the exhaust gas temperature exceeded 300°C, and high concentrations of semi-volatile material were emitted (e.g. regenerations, lubricant oil).|
|JRC Directorate:||Energy, Transport and Climate|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.