Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Assessing forest availability for wood supply in Europe|
|Authors:||ALBERDI ICIAR; BENDER SUSANN; RIEDEL THOMAS; AVITABILE VALERIO; BOURIAUD OLIVIER; BOSELA MICHAL; CAMIA ANDREA; CANELLAS ISABEL; CASTRO REGO FRANCISCO; FISCHER CHRISTOPH; FREUDENSCHUSS ALEXANDRA; FRIDMAN JONAS; GASPARINI PATRIZIA; GSCHWANTER THOMAS; GUERRERO SILVIA; KJARTANSSON B. T.; KUCERA MILOS; LANZ ADRIAN; MARIN GHERORGHE; MUBAREKA SARAH; NOTARANGELO MONICA; NUNES LEONIA; PESTY BENOIT; PIKULA TOMAS; REDMOND JOHN; RIZZO MARIA; SEBEN VLADIMIR; SNORRASON ARNOR; TOMTER STEIN; HERNANDEZ LAURA|
|Citation:||FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS vol. 111 p. 102032|
|Publisher:||ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||The quantification of forests available for wood supply (FAWS) is essential for decision-making with regard to the maintenance and enhancement of forest resources and their contribution to the global carbon cycle. The provision of harmonized forest statistics is necessary for the development of forest associated policies and to support decisionmaking. Based on the National Forest Inventory (NFI) data from 13 European countries, we quantify and compare the areas and aboveground dry biomass (AGB) of FAWS and forest not available for wood supply (FNAWS) according to national and reference definitions by determining the restrictions and associated thresholds considered at country level to classify forests as FAWS or FNAWS. FAWS represent between 75 and 95 % of forest area and AGB for most of the countries in this study. Economic restrictions are the main factor limiting the availability of forests for wood supply, accounting for 67% of the total FNAWS area and 56% of the total FNAWS AGB, followed by environmental restrictions. Profitability, slope and accessibility as economic restrictions, and protected areas as environmental restrictions are the factors most frequently considered to distinguish between FAWS and FNAWS. With respect to the area of FNAWS associated with each type of restriction, an overlap among the restrictions of 13.7% was identified. For most countries, the differences in the FNAWS areas and AGB estimates between national and reference definitions ranged from 0 to 5%. These results highlight the applicability and reliability of a FAWS reference definition for most of the European countries studied, thereby facilitating a consistent approach to assess forests available for supply for the purpose of international reporting.|
|JRC Directorate:||Sustainable Resources|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.