Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPOGORZELSKA KATARZYNAen_GB
dc.contributor.authorRIGHI RICCARDOen_GB
dc.contributor.authorCARDONA MELISANDEen_GB
dc.contributor.authorLOPEZ COBO MONTSERRATen_GB
dc.contributor.authorZIEMBA LUKASZ WOJCIECHen_GB
dc.contributor.authorVAZQUEZ-PRADA BAILLET MIGUELen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSAMOILI SOFIAen_GB
dc.contributor.authorDE PRATO GIUDITTAen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T01:05:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-11en_GB
dc.date.available2019-12-12T01:05:33Z-
dc.date.created2019-12-05en_GB
dc.date.issued2019en_GB
dc.date.submitted2019-11-04en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-76-10384-4 (online)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1831-9424 (online)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherEUR 29946 ENen_GB
dc.identifier.otherOP KJ-NA-29946-EN-N (online)en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118467-
dc.description.abstractThis report analyses the worldwide landscape of the Earth observation ecosystem to identify opportunities, synergies, and obstacles that need to be addressed to foster the development of a vibrant space data economy in Europe. The report uses the Techno-Economic Segment (TES) analytical approach to provide a holistic view of the EO and geospatial ecosystem in Europe and worldwide through the identification of players and key clusters of activities. It also takes into consideration the potential flows of knowledge resulting from shared activities, locations and technological fields. The approach adopts a micro-based perspective considering a wide range of both horizontal and segment specific data sources. The outcome is a compelling characterisation of the key features of this very dynamic ecosystem. The TES EO ecosystem shows a very diverse global landscape with three distinguished global hubs, namely EU28, China and the US, as possible incubators for EO-linked innovation. Those hubs have the largest number of players in case of R&D and well as in case of industry. Nevertheless, the distribution of EO activities and concentration of those activities look quite different in the three leading macro areas. As far as the R&D activities are considered, the EU28 has the highest overall number of players involved in the all types of R&D activities, but scores quite low if only the patents are taken into account. Out of the three big players, the US has the smallest number of players involved in the overall EO R&D and stable position in number of patenting. In case of China, the largest number of R&D activities is concentrated in hands of relatively few players. In conclusion, the findings of this report confirm a general expectation about the growth in the EO downstream segment. However, up to 2017 the growth has not been staggering. Since 2017, there have been continuous policy efforts to increase the uptake of EO data in order to enable market growth.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.B.6-Digital Economyen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherPublications Office of the European Unionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC118467en_GB
dc.titleThe techno-economic segment analysis of the Earth observation ecosystemen_GB
dc.typeEUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reportsen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2760/538664 (online)en_GB
JRC Directorate:Growth and Innovation

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jrc118467_eo_tes_report_5_dec_2019_final.pdf3.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.