Contracting and farmers’ perception of unfair trading practices in the EU dairy sector

It is commonly asserted that unfair trading practices (UTPs) emerge largely as a result of contract incompleteness. In line with this view it is claimed that making contracts more complete will represent an antidote to UTPs. In this paper we argue that this does not need to be the case. This is because contracts, except for their potential to increase the surplus generated in the transaction, determine how this surplus will be divided. This, in turn, makes it possible for both trading partners to use contractual terms to turn the distributional conflict to their advantage. In the presence of unequal distribution of bargaining power this may lead to a situation in which the stronger party may succeed in tilting the contract in its favour by including UTPs in the contract content. Drawing insights from data collected in 2017 through a field survey among dairy farmers in France, Germany, Poland and Spain, we find support for this argument. Our estimation results show that contract completeness increases the likelihood of farmers reporting that their contracts with processors include the practices that may be considered as UTPs. Further, and also in line with this argument, contract completeness does not seem to affect UTPs during the contract execution or its termination.

DI MARCANTONIO Federica;  CIAIAN Pavel;  FALKOWSKI Jan; 

2020-08-31

WILEY

JRC120827

0021-857X (online),   

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1477-9552.12388,    https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC120827,   

10.1111/1477-9552.12388 (online),