Collective minimum contributions to counteract the ratchet effect in the voluntary provision of public goods

We experimentally test a theoretically promising amendment to the ratchet-up mechanism of the Paris Agreement. The ratchet-up mechanism prescribes that parties’ commitments to the global response to climate change cannot decrease over time, and our results show that its effect is detrimental. We design a public goods game to study whether cooperation is promoted by an amendment to the mechanism that stipulates that all agents must contribute at least a collectively chosen minimum based on the principle of the lowest common denominator. We find that binding collective minimum contributions improve the effectiveness of the ratchet-up mechanism. Non-binding minimum contributions, by contrast, do not encourage cooperation. Our data indicate that the difference is attributable to conditional cooperative dynamics. If other participants contribute less than the collective minimum contribution, even initially cooperative participants start to negatively reciprocate this form of non-compliance by contributing less.

ALT Marius;  GALLIER Carlo;  KESTERNICH Martin;  STURM Bodo; 

2023-11-23

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE

JRC131008

0095-0696 (online),   

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069623001134,    https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC131008,   

10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102895 (online),