Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution
among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand
the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we
describe and synthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production
data, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-use and land-use
change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly, and its growth rate
(GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) is estimated with
global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based fCO2 products. The terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND)
is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. Additional lines of evidence on land and ocean sinks are
provided by atmospheric inversions, atmospheric oxygen measurements, and Earth system models. The resulting
carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes
in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and incomplete understanding
of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as 1 .
For the year 2022, EFOS increased by 0.9% relative to 2021, with fossil emissions at 9:9 0:5 GtC yr-1
(10:2 0:5 GtC yr-1 when the cement carbonation sink is not included), and ELUC was 1:2 0:7 GtC yr-1,
for a total anthropogenic CO2 emission (including the cement carbonation sink) of 11:1 0:8 GtC yr-1
(40:7 3:2 GtCO2 yr-1). Also, for 2022, GATM was 4:6 0:2 GtC yr-1 (2:18 0:1 ppm yr-1; ppm denotes parts
per million), SOCEAN was 2:8 0:4 GtC yr1, and SLAND was 3:8 0:8 GtC yr-1, with a BIM of -0:1 GtC yr-1
(i.e. total estimated sources marginally too low or sinks marginally too high). The global atmospheric CO2 concentration
averaged over 2022 reached 417:1 0:1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2023 suggest an increase in EFOS
relative to 2022 of C1:1% (0.0% to 2.1 %) globally and atmospheric CO2 concentration reaching 419.3 ppm,
51% above the pre-industrial level (around 278 ppm in 1750). Overall, the mean of and trend in the components
of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2022, with a near-zero overall
budget imbalance, although discrepancies of up to around 1 Gt Cyr1 persist for the representation of annual
to semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations
shows the following: (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use changes emissions, (2) a low
agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics,
and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the strength of the ocean sink over the last decade.
This living-data update documents changes in methods and data sets applied to this most recent global carbon
budget as well as evolving community understanding of the global carbon cycle. The data presented in this work
are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2023 (Friedlingstein et al., 2023).
FRIEDLINGSTEIN P;
O’SULLIVAN Michael;
W. JONES Matthew;
ANDREW Robbie;
BAKKER Dorothee C. E.;
HAUCK Judith;
LANDSCHÜTZER Peter;
LE QUÉRÉ Corinne;
LUIJKX Ingrid T.;
PETERS Glen P.;
PETERS Wouter;
PONGRATZ Julia;
SCHWINGSHACKL Clemens;
SITCH Stephen;
CANADELL Josep G.;
CIAIS Philippe;
JACKSON Robert B.;
ALIN Simone R.;
ANTHONI Peter;
BARBERO Leticia;
BATES Nicholas;
BECKER Meike;
BELLOUIN Nicolas;
DECHARME Bertrand;
BOPP Laurent;
BRASIKA Ida Bagus Mandhara;
CADULE Patricia;
CHAMBERLAIN Matthew A.;
CHANDRA Naveen;
CHAU Thi-Tuyet-Trang;
CHEVALLIER Frédéric;
CHINI Louise P.;
CRONIN Margot;
DOU Xinyu;
ENYO Kazutaka;
EVANS Wiley;
FALK Stefanie;
FEELY Richard A.;
FENG Liang;
FORD Daniel J.;
GASSER Thomas;
GHATTAS Josefine;
GKRITZALIS Thanos;
GRASSI Giacomo;
GREGOR Luke;
GRUBER N.;
GÜRSES Ö;
HARRIS Ian;
HEFNER Matthew;
HEINKE Jens;
HOUGHTON Richard A.;
HURTT G.;
IIDA Yosuke;
ILYINA Tatiana;
JACOBSON A. R.;
JAIN A.K.;
JARNÍKOVÁ Tereza;
JERSILD Annika;
JIANG Fei;
JIN Zhe;
JOOS Fortunat;
KATO Etsushi;
KEELING Ralph F.;
KENNEDY Daniel;
KLEIN GOLDEWIJK Kees;
KNAUER Juergen;
KORSBAKKEN Jan Ivar;
KÖRTZINGER Arne;
LAN Xin;
LEFÈVRE Nathalie;
HONGMEI Li;
LIU Junjie;
LIU Zhiqiang;
MA Lei;
MARLAND G.;
MAYOT Nicolas;
MCGUIRE Patrick C.;
MCKINLEY Galen A.;
MEYER Gesa;
MORGAN Eric J.;
MUNRO David R.;
NAKAOKA Shin-Ichiro;
NIWA Y;
O'BRIEN Kevin;
OLSEN Are;
OMAR Abdirahman M.;
ONO Tsuneo;
PAULSEN Melf;
PIERROT Denis;
POCOCK Katie;
POULTER Benjamin;
POWIS Carter;
REHDER Gregor;
RESPLANDY Laure;
ROBERTSON Eddy;
RÖDENBECK Christian;
ROSAN Thais M.;
SCHWINGER Jörg;
SÉFÉRIAN Roland;
SMALLMAN T. Luke;
SMITH Stephen M.;
SOSPEDRA-ALFONSO Reinel;
SUN Qing;
SUTTON Adrienne J.;
SWEENEY Colm;
TAKAO Shintaro;
TANS Pieter P.;
TIAN Hanqin;
TILBROOK Bronte;
TSUJINO Hiroyuki;
TUBIELLO Francesco;
VAN DER WERF Guido R.;
VAN OOIJEN Erik;
WANNINKHOF Rik;
WATANABE Michio;
WIMART-ROUSSEAU Cathy;
YANG Dongxu;
YANG Xiaojuan;
YUAN Wenping;
YUE Xu;
ZAEHLE Sönke;
ZENG Jiye;
ZHENG Bo;
2024-11-29
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
JRC135243
1866-3508 (online),
https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5301/2023/,
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC135243,
10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023 (online),
