Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.contributor.author||FENTEM Julia helen||en_GB|
|dc.contributor.author||PRINSEN Menk k.||en_GB|
|dc.contributor.author||BOTHAM Philip a.||en_GB|
|dc.identifier.citation||Toxicology in Vitro vol. 9 no. 6 p. 857-862||en_GB|
|dc.description.abstract||With regard to the problems encountered and the experience gained in validation studies conducted in the past, suggestions have been made concerning criteria for the selection of the tests and laboratories to be included in a validation study, the selection and distribution of test chemicals, and procedures for the handing, analysis and interpretation of the resulting ddata. In particular, tests should have been developed to the extent that detailed protocols and standards operating procedures have been produced and evaluated. The laboratories should be chosen on the basis of evidence of their appropriate experience, competence and ability to comply with good laboratory practice (GLP) requirements. The choise of test chemicals depends primarily on the goals of the validation study and on the availability of reliable in vitro toxicity data of high quality. A biostatistician should be involved in the initial design of the validationstudy as well as in the analysis of the resulting data. The quality of the in vivo and in vitro data must be ensured, prior to determining the reproducibility and predictivity of the alternative test.||en_GB|
|dc.title||Validation - Lessons Learned from Practical Experience||en_GB|
|dc.type||Articles in periodicals and books||en_GB|
|JRC Directorate:||Joint Research Centre Historical Collection|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.