Use of radiative transfer modeling for quality assurance.
This paper presents the latest results of the RAdiation Transfer Model Intercomparison (RAMI) of the realistic scenes. RAMI-V included same scenes of RAMI-IV phase but with two new realistic ones, defined through a semi-parametric (Savanna) and an empirical (Wytham Wood) approaches. Measurements were the Bidirectional Reflectance Factor (BRF), Directional Hemispherical Reflectance (DHR) and Bidirectional Hemispherical Reflectance (BHR). In addition, the radiant flux transmission and absorption through and below the canopy and Digital Hemispherical Photography (DHP) were also part of the simulations. The spectral bands were defined to mimic the ones of Copernicus optical missions, e.g. for the Sentinel-3 Ocean Land Colour Imager (OLCI) and Sentinel-2 MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI), but also the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). New solar and viewing geometry configurations were adopted from real satellite overpasses, for different seasons and geographical locations. The role of internal consistency checks were reinforced to provide more reliable feedback to the participants in the early stage of the experiment, and reduce the role of outliers in the model to model comparison and the identification of a surrogate reference. Over four of the eight scenarios proposed, a set of models agreed within 2% uncertainty thresholds for most of the virtual measurements defined in the experiment. Specifically, they were the birchstand both leaf-on (HET09) and leaf-off (HET15) versions, and the structured canopy models consisting of a citrus orchard (HET14) and a poplar forest (HET16). It is noteworthy that less was among the models designated to set a reference benchmark across all chosen instances. Conversely, dart, raytran, and wps were contributing to the benchmark in most of the experiment proposed, especially referring to total bi-directional and directional-hemispherical reflectance, and total absorption, while for the transmittance the results were more dispersed. The proficiency testing of the models was performed by means of the z’ metric defined in ISO-13528. A custom reference, based on a selection of models which showed the best agreement, as well as a reference based on robust statistic were adopted. The approach based on the robust statistic described in ISO-13528 confirmed its relevance in inter-laboratory comparisons exercises where the benchmark is not defined a-priori, allowing us to obtain proficiency results equivalent to those defined against the customized references.
LANCONELLI Christian;
GOBRON Nadine;
ROBUSTELLI Monica;
ADAMS Jennifer;
CALDERS Kim;
DISNEY Mathias;
GASTELLU-ETCHEGORRY Jean-Philippe;
GOODENOUGH Adam;
GOVAERTS Yves;
HOGAN Robin;
HUAGUO Huang;
KOBAYASHI Hideki;
KUUSK Andres;
LEROY Vincent;
ORIGO Niall;
QI Jianbo;
SCHUNKE Sebastian;
VAN LEEUWEN Martin;
WANG Yingjie;
ZENG Yelu;
ZHAO Feng;
2025-01-15
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
JRC139631
2694-1589 (online),
https://spj.science.org/doi/epdf/10.34133/remotesensing.0663,
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC139631,
10.34133/remotesensing.0663 (online),
