Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMARTINHO GUIMARAES PIRES PEREIRA Angelaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorRAES Franken_GB
dc.contributor.authorDE SOUSA BRILHANTE PEDROSA Tiagoen_GB
dc.contributor.authorROSA Pauloen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBRODERSEN Søsseren_GB
dc.contributor.authorJOERGENSEN Michaelen_GB
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA Franciscoen_GB
dc.contributor.authorQUEROL Xavieren_GB
dc.contributor.authorREA Johnen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T00:10:02Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-07en_GB
dc.date.available2015-05-20T00:10:02Z-
dc.date.created2009-10-06en_GB
dc.date.issued2009en_GB
dc.date.submitted2008-11-20en_GB
dc.identifier.citationATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT vol. 43 no. 33 p. 5423-5432en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1352-2310en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231009005093en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC48850-
dc.description.abstractFor more than two decades a number of frameworks for scientific knowledge production are being proposed by science and technology researchers. They all advocate an extended involvement of non-specialists, in particular when it comes to knowledge production applicable to practical societal problems. We look to what extent these new frameworks have taken ground within a particular research community: the ACCENT Network of Excellence which coordinates European atmospheric chemistry and physics research applicable to air pollution and climate change. We did so by stimulating a debate through a ¿blog¿, a survey and interviews with ACCENT scientists about the interaction between science, policy making and civil society. About 10% of scientists in the network contributed to the debate in writing or talking. Most of them had interactions with either policy makers or the general public in the past, and they somehow believe that trans-disciplinary interactions are needed. While such interactions give personal insights and satisfaction, they seem to have only little impact on the goals and the mode of the scientific work itself. That work and its evaluation is still largely determined by a Kuhnian paradigm nurtured and institutionalized by the project, hence by the scientific community itself and without involvement of non-scientists. Trans-disciplinary thinking that is present at the level of individual scientists still needs to find its way to the level of scientific project management. We discuss the justifications and barriers, as well as recommendations to implement a higher degree of trans-disciplinarity in applied science projects such as ACCENT.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.G.3-Econometrics and applied statisticsen_GB
dc.format.mediumPrinteden_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC48850en_GB
dc.titleAtmospheric Composition Change Research: Time to go Post-normal?en_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.016en_GB
JRC Directorate:Space, Security and Migration

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.