THE PRINT MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT WAS ANALYSED IIN SEVEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES. THE GOAL WAS TO IDENTIFY COMMON COMMUNICATIONS PROBLEMS AND TO SUGGEST HOW THEY MIGHT BE RESOLVED. ASIDE FROM DIFFICULTIES WITH TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON UNITS OF RADIATION EXPOSURE, CONTAMINATION, AND EFFECTS, THE MEDIA DID A REASONABLY GOOD JOB OF PRESENTING TO THE PUBLIC THE INFORMATION THEY WERE GIVEN BY OFFICIAL SOURCES. SOME EVIDENCE OF CONFUSION WAS FOUND, AND IT AFFECTED THE CREDIBILITY OF COMMUNICATIONS, BUT THE PRESS SEEMED TO BE REFLECTING CONFUSION EXISTING WITHIN CRISIS MANAGEMENT TEAMS AND THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY RATHER THAN CREATING IT. SOME OF THE MORE COMMON PROBLEMS ARE DISCUSSED AND IDEAS FOR IMPROVING CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND THE COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION ABOUT RISKS ARE EXPLORED
OTWAY Harry;
PARUCCINI Massimo;
CANNELL William;
GIANITSOPOLOUS Giorgios;
1995-03-15
European Commission
JRC4965
EUR 11043 EN,
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC4965,
| Name | Country | City | Type |
|---|
This document is only visible at the Commission level.
You are not authorized to publish or distribute it outside the European Commission.
This is a public document. You can share this publication.
Datasets
| ID | Title | Public URL |
|---|
Dataset collections
| ID | Acronym | Title | Public URL |
|---|
Scripts / source codes
| Description | Public URL |
|---|
Additional supporting files
| File name | Description | File type |
|---|