A Review of the Major Pisc II Round Robin Test Results
VARIABLES CONSIDERED BY THE PISC GROUP FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE RRT RESULTS ARE DISCUSSED. DATA STORAGE, DATA CLEANING, AND COMPUTER CODES ARE DESCRIBED. RESULTS ARE EXPRESSED FOR THE DIFFERENT TEST ASSEMBLIES AT DIFFERENT LEVELS 1. CONSIDERING FULL PROCEDURES RESULTS (E.G. ASME TYPE PROCEDURES WITH 20% DAC CUT-OFF) 2. CONSIDERING PROCEDURES RESULTS AS A FUNCTION OF SEVERAL PARAMETERS INCLU- DING CUT-OFF LEVEL, DEFECT POSITION, DEFECT SIZE, DEFECT CHARACTERISTICS, AND UNCERTAINITY ON DEFECT SIZE, AND 3. CONSIDERING TECHNIQUES (COMPONENTS OF PROCEDURES) RESULTS AS A FUNCTION OF THEPARAMETERS ABOVE.
CRUTZEN Serge;
VINCHE Claude;
HAINES N.;
1995-03-15
JRC5072
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC5072,
Additional supporting files
| File name | Description | File type | |
|---|
