Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMELIN Fredericen_GB
dc.contributor.authorCLERICI Marcoen_GB
dc.contributor.authorZIBORDI Giuseppeen_GB
dc.contributor.authorHOLBEN Brenten_GB
dc.contributor.authorSMIRNOV Alexanderen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-25T14:39:12Z-
dc.date.available2010-01-13en_GB
dc.date.available2010-02-25T14:39:12Z-
dc.date.created2010-01-04en_GB
dc.date.issued2010en_GB
dc.date.submitted2009-08-07en_GB
dc.identifier.citationREMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT vol. 114 no. 2 p. 230-250en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC53638-
dc.description.abstractThe validation of aerosol products derived from ocean color missions is required for the assessment of their uncertainties and as a diagnostic for the atmospheric correction schemes used for determining the ocean apparent optical properties. A comprehensive validation of the aerosol products obtained from the ocean color missions SeaWiFS and MODIS is presented; it relies on the field observations collected at 85 AERONET sites and is completed by preliminary results obtained with the data of the maritime AERONET component. A robust match-up selection protocol yields approximately 7000 match-ups for each sensor. The median absolute relative difference |psi| for the aerosol optical thickness tau increases from 20-22% at 443 nm to 45-48% in the near-infrared. The validation statistics are comparable for both sensors but MODIS results appear degraded particularly for sites located on isolated islands. The median absolute difference |delta| is approximately 0.03 at all wavelengths. Results are further analyzed for specific geographic regions or groups of sites selected to represent oceanic, continental, or desert dust conditions. Importantly, the match-up sets appear generally representative of the regional natural variability in ta amplitude and spectral shape, with the notable exception of high tau conditions that are excluded. An important finding is the underestimate by the atmospheric correction of the Angstrom exponent alpha, with a median bias of -0.52. This underestimate is apparent even at low alpha values and regularly increases with alpha. This discrepancy in the derived spectral shape of tau might result from an inappropriate set of candidate aerosol models and/or uncertainties in the calibration at the near-infrared bands. As the validation data base is expanded and updated in relation to new versions of the processing chains, this work provides a benchmark for the assessment of the aerosol products derived from the SeaWiFS and MODIS ocean color missions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.DDG.H.3-Global environement monitoringen_GB
dc.format.mediumPrinteden_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INCen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC53638en_GB
dc.titleValidation of SeaWiFS and MODIS Aerosol Products with Globally Distributed AERONET Dataen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2009.09.003en_GB
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.