A comparison of the coincidence summing correction methods is presented. Since there are several ways for computing these corrections, each method has advantages and drawbacks that could be compared. This part of the comparison was restricted to point sources. The same experimental spectra, decay scheme and photon emission intensities were used by all the participants. The results were
expressed as coincidence summing correction factors for several energies of 152Eu and 134Cs, and three source-to-detector distances. They are presented and discussed.
LEPY M.C.;
ALTZITZOGLOU Timotheos;
ANAGNOSTAKIS M.J.;
ARNOLD D.;
CAPOGNI M.;
CECCATELLI A.;
DE FELICE P.;
DERSCH Rainer;
DRYAK P.;
FAZIO A.;
FERREUX L.;
GUARDATI M.;
HAN J.;
HURTADO S.;
KARFOPOULOS K. L.;
KLEMOLA S.;
KOVAR P.;
LEE K.B.;
OCONE R.;
OTT O.;
SIMA O.;
SUDAR S.;
SVEC Anton;
CHAU Van Tao;
TRAN Thien Thanh;
VIDMAR T.;
2010-06-17
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
JRC58929
0969-8043,
www.elsevier.com/locate/apradiso,
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC58929,
10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.01.012,
| Name | Country | City | Type |
|---|
This document is only visible at the Commission level.
You are not authorized to publish or distribute it outside the European Commission.
This is a public document. You can share this publication.
Datasets
| ID | Title | Public URL |
|---|
Dataset collections
| ID | Acronym | Title | Public URL |
|---|
Scripts / source codes
| Description | Public URL |
|---|
Additional supporting files
| File name | Description | File type |
|---|