Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBARBIERE MAURIZIOen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBELIS CLAUDIOen_GB
dc.contributor.authorKAPUS Matejen_GB
dc.contributor.authorLAGLER Friedrichen_GB
dc.contributor.authorKARAGULIAN FEDERICOen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-07T00:00:54Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-06en_GB
dc.date.available2011-10-07T00:00:54Z-
dc.date.created2011-09-23en_GB
dc.date.issued2011en_GB
dc.date.submitted2011-09-05en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-79-21264-2en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1831-9424 (online), 1018-5593 (print)en_GB
dc.identifier.otherEUR 24943 ENen_GB
dc.identifier.otherOPOCE LB-NA-24943-EN-Nen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC66569-
dc.description.abstractFrom the 14th to the 17th of June 2010 in Ispra (IT), 9 Laboratories of AQUILA (Network of European Air Quality Reference Laboratories) met at an interlaboratory comparison exercise to evaluate their proficiency in the analysis of inorganic gaseous pollutants covered by European Directive about air quality (SO2, CO, NO, NO2 and O3). The proficiency evaluation, where each participant’s bias was compared to two criteria, provides information on the current situation and capabilities to the European Commission and can be used by participants in their quality control system. On the basis of criteria imposed by the European Commission, 85% of the results reported by AQUILA laboratories were good both in terms of measured values and reported uncertainties. Another 12% of the results had good measured values, but the reported uncertainties were either too high (8%) or too small (4%). Comparability of results among AQUILA participants at the highest concentration level, excluding outliers, is acceptable in NO, CO and O3 measurements while NO2 and SO2 measurement methods showed less satisfactory results.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.H.2-Climate change and air qualityen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherPublications Office of the European Unionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC66569en_GB
dc.titleThe evaluation of the interlaboratory comparison exercise for SO2, CO, O3, NO and NO2 14-17 June 2010en_GB
dc.typeEUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reportsen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2788/67437en_GB
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ispra2010_final.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.