Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPILOTTO Francescaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorFREE Garyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorCARDOSO Anaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorWOLFRAM Georgen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSOLIMINI Angeloen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T00:01:28Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-04en_GB
dc.date.available2012-06-07T00:01:28Z-
dc.date.created2012-05-25en_GB
dc.date.issued2011en_GB
dc.date.submitted2011-09-29en_GB
dc.identifier.citationFUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED LIMNOLOGY vol. 180 no. 2 p. 101-110en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1863-9135en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC66944-
dc.description.abstractInvertebrate communities inhabiting different lake zones (littoral, sublittoral and profundal) are expected to respond differently to natural environmental variation and anthropogenic stressors. We used multivariate statistical methods in order to quantify the effects of eutrophication and morphological pressures on the spatial structure of the invertebrate benthic communities at two depth zones (profundal and sublittoral) in subalpine lakes. In both lake zones, environmental variables related to eutrophication pressures (mid-lake TP and chla) were significant in structuring the invertebrate community (forward selection: p<0.01). Three variables related to morphological pressures (diversity of macrophyte growth form types, sum of pressures and percentage of natural land cover within a 200 m stretch from the lake shore) were significant (forward selection: p<0.01) in the sublittoral zone, while in the profundal zone none of the variables included in the analysis related to morphological pressures was significant. Variance partitioning analysis showed that profundal communities were mainly affected by eutrophication (8.55% of total variance; p=0.005), while in the sublittoral zone eutrophication accounted for only 0.49% (p=0.04). The effects of morphological pressures could be tracked only in the sublittoral zone, where it accounted for 0.82% of total variance (p=0.015). The spatial component was responsible for large part of the total variance (58.66% in the profundal, p=0.005; 44.18% in the sublittoral zone, p=0.005) and had interactions with stressor variables in both lake zones. Therefore the analysis of spatial patterns should be included in assessment systems relating invertebrate assemblages to pressures.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.H.1-Water Resourcesen_GB
dc.format.mediumPrinteden_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherE SCHWEIZERBARTSCHE VERLAGSen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC66944en_GB
dc.titleSpatial variance of profundal and sublittoral invertebrate benthic communities in response to eutrophication and morphological pressuresen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0206en_GB
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.