Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLOISEL Rodicaen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-28T00:00:58Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-27en_GB
dc.date.available2012-06-28T00:00:58Z-
dc.date.created2012-06-06en_GB
dc.date.issued2012en_GB
dc.date.submitted2012-01-11en_GB
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER \& ENERGY SYSTEMS vol. 42 p. 542-552en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0142-0615en_GB
dc.identifier.uriwww.elsevier.com/locate/ijepesen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC68584-
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes power storage as a key option to support wind energy integration. The case study is the French power system, whose characteristics rely on high rates of nuclear power and a strong emerging wind energy market. A dynamic optimization dispatching model is used to simulate the operation of the power system, under two development scenarios of the technology mix by 2030, one scenario documented by European Commission, EC [1], and a second one by French Transmission System Operator, RTE [2]. Both scenarios result in power storage requirements of around 7 TWh for more than 4 GW installed storage capacity of pumped hydro power plants in France as a whole. In this context, it is assessed the profitability of an additional regional project of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) located in the region of Bretagne. It shows how benefits could accrue by avoiding the regional wind curtailment of 59 GWh, by providing ancillary services such as secondary reserve, and by increasing the use of grid assets and the nuclear power output with more than 230 GWh. The profitability of the CAES project remains however negative, around -70 €/MWh despite the social value and the system benefits that results in. The study assesses possible ways to incentivize the investment in new storage projects, through for instance contracts for difference, which would link the storage operation, its investment cost and stage of development to the power market design via power prices and a pre-defined rate of return. The periodical revision of these regulatory arrangements would enable the storage investor to recover the investment cost and would eliminate the risk of over rewarding generators in the case of windfall profits.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.F.6-Energy systems evaluationen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC68584en_GB
dc.titlePower System Flexibility With Electricity Storage Technologies: a Technical-economic Assessment of a Large-scale Storage Facilityen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.04.058en_GB
JRC Directorate:Energy, Transport and Climate

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.