Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPETROKOFSKY Gillianen_GB
dc.contributor.authorKANAMARU Hidekien_GB
dc.contributor.authorACHARD Fredericen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGOETZ Scotten_GB
dc.contributor.authorJOOSTEN Hansen_GB
dc.contributor.authorHOLMGREN P.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorLEHTONEN Aleksyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMENTON Mary C. S.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorPULLIN Andrew Sen_GB
dc.contributor.authorWATTENBACH Martinen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-28T00:29:00Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-04en_GB
dc.date.available2015-05-28T00:29:00Z-
dc.date.created2013-01-08en_GB
dc.date.issued2012en_GB
dc.date.submitted2012-06-21en_GB
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Evidence vol. 1 p. 6en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/1/1/6en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC72395-
dc.description.abstractBackground Climate change and high rates of global carbon emissions have focussed attention on the need for high-quality monitoring systems to assess how much carbon is present in terrestrial systems and how these change over time. The choice of system to adopt should be guided by good science. There is a growing body of scientific and technical information on groundbased and remote sensing methods of carbon measurement. The adequacy and comparability of these different systems have not been fully evaluated. Methods A systematic review will compare methods of assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in key land use categories, including, forest land, cropland, grassland, and wetlands, in terrestrial carbon pools that can be accounted for under the Kyoto protocol (above-ground biomass, below-ground biomass, deadwood, litter and soil carbon). Assessing carbon in harvested wood products will not be considered in this review. Discussion Developing effective mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions and equitable adaptation strategies to cope with increasing global temperatures will rely on robust scientific information that is free from biases imposed by national and commercial interests. A systematic review of the methods used for assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes will contribute to the transparent analysis of complex and often contradictory science.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.H.3-Forest Resources and Climateen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherBioMeden_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC72395en_GB
dc.titleComparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocolen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/2047-2382-1-6en_GB
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.