Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorANGERS ALEXANDREen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBONFINI Lauraen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPETRILLO MAUROen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPATAK DENNSTEDT Alexandreen_GB
dc.contributor.authorKREYSA JOACHIMen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-21T01:01:15Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-20en_GB
dc.date.available2013-12-21T01:01:15Z-
dc.date.created2013-12-16en_GB
dc.date.issued2013en_GB
dc.date.submitted2013-12-04en_GB
dc.identifier.isbn978-92-79-34919-5en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1831-9424en_GB
dc.identifier.otherEUR 26393en_GB
dc.identifier.otherOPOCE LB-NA-26393-EN-Nen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC86656-
dc.description.abstractIn view of the recent necessity to perform testing for the detection of genetically modified common wheat (Triticum aestivum), the need arises for a taxon-specific method for this organism. However, no such method has yet been officially validated. Multiple species of wheat exist on the market, such as common wheat, durum wheat, emmer wheat, etc. These plants have complex genomes, composed of different combinations (from diploid to hexaploid) of common sets of chromosomes. The specificity of a method then depends on which set of chromosome the targeted region is located, which increases the complexity of identifying methods specific to Triticum aestivum. Often, such methods were developed for the specific regulatory need of differentiating durum and common wheat (for example, in alimentary pasta labeling), with minimal concerns for non-specific detection of other plants. This document summarises the review performed by the EU-RL GMFF, complemented with in-house bioinformatics analyses, in order to identify and characterise Triticum aestivum-specific detection methods that have been described in the scientific literature. Methods with apparent specificity (based on results shown and bioinformatics analyses) and promising performance (based on results shown) are highlighted and their primers and probe sequences reported. Those methods are the 'SS II-D' and ' SS II ex7' methods described in Matsuoka et al. (2012) and the 'wx012' method described in Iida et al. (2005), and they represent good candidates to uniquely identify common wheat in complex food samples.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.I.3-Molecular Biology and Genomicsen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherPublications Office of the European Unionen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC86656en_GB
dc.titleLiterature and Bioinformatics Analyses of Wheat-specific Detection Methodsen_GB
dc.typeEUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reportsen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2788/4973en_GB
JRC Directorate:Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Historical Collection

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
wheat_bioinformatics technical report_with registration.pdf760.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.