Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||ITS-NANO - Prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy|
|Authors:||STONE Vicki; POZZI-MUCELLI Stefano; TRAN C. Lang; ASCHBERGER KARIN; SABELLA Stefania; VOGEL Ulla B; POLAND Craig; BALHARRY Dominique; FERNANDES Teresa F.; GOTTARDO STEFANIA; HANKIN Steve; HARTL Mark; HARTMANN NANNA; HRISTOZOV Danail; HUND-RINKE K.; JOHNSTON Helinor; MARCOMINI Antonio; PANZER Oliver; RONCATO Davide; SABER Anne T; WALLIN Hakan; SCOTT-FORDSMAND Janeck|
|Citation:||PARTICLE AND FIBRE TOXICOLOGY vol. 11 no. 9 p. 1-11|
|Publisher:||BIOMED CENTRAL LTD|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Background: To assess the risk of all nanomaterials (NMs) on a case-by-case basis is challenging in terms of financial, ethical and time resources. Instead a more intelligent approach to knowledge gain and risk assessment is required. Methods: The framework of future research priorities was developed from the accorded opinion of experts covering all major stake holder groups (government, industry, academia, funders and NGOs). It recognises and stresses the major topics of physicochemical characterisation, exposure identification, hazard identification and modelling approaches as key components of the current and future risk assessment of NMs. Results: A framework for future research has been developed from the opinions of over 80 stakeholders, that describes the research priorities for effective development of an intelligent testing strategy (ITS) to allow risk evaluation of NMs. In this context, an ITS is a process that allows the risks of NMs to be assessed accurately, effectively and efficiently, thereby reducing the need to test NMs on a case-by-case basis. For each of the major topics of physicochemical characterisation, exposure identification, hazard identification and modelling, key-priority research areas are described via a series of stepping stones, or hexagon diagrams structured into a time perspective. Importantly, this framework is flexible, allowing individual stakeholders to identify where their own activities and expertise are positioned within the prioritisation pathway and furthermore to identify how they can effectively contribute and structure their work accordingly. In other words, the prioritisation hexagon diagrams provide a tool that individual stakeholders can adapt to meet their own particular needs and to deliver an ITS for NMs risk assessment. Such an approach would, over time, reduce the need for testing by increasing the reliability and sophistication of in silico approaches. The manuscript includes an appraisal of how this framework relates to the current risk assessment approaches and how future risk assessment could adapt to accommodate these new approaches. A full report is available in electronic format (pdf) at www.its-nano.eu. Conclusion: ITS-NANO has delivered a detailed, stakeholder driven and flexible research prioritisation (or strategy) tool, which identifies specific research needs, suggests connections between areas, and frames this in a time-perspective.|
|JRC Directorate:||Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Historical Collection|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.