Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBORJA Angelen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPRINS Theoen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSIMBOURA Nomikien_GB
dc.contributor.authorANDERSEN Jesper H.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorBERG Torstenen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMARQUES Joao Carlosen_GB
dc.contributor.authorNETO João M.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorPAPADOPOULOU Nadiaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorREKER Johnnyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGONCALVES TEIXEIRA HELIANAen_GB
dc.contributor.authorUUSITALO Lauraen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-28T02:27:23Z-
dc.date.available2015-01-05en_GB
dc.date.available2015-05-28T02:27:23Z-
dc.date.created2014-12-19en_GB
dc.date.issued2014en_GB
dc.date.submitted2014-10-29en_GB
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Marine Science vol. 1 p. 72en_GB
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/Abstract.aspx?s=634&name=marine_ecosystem_ecology&ART_DOI=10.3389/fmars.2014.00072en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC92380-
dc.description.abstractAssessing the environmental status of marine ecosystems is useful when communicating key messages to policymakers or the society, reducing the complex information of the multiple ecosystem and biodiversity components and their important spatial and temporal variability into manageable units. Taking into account the ecosystem components to be addressed (e.g. biological, chemical, physical), the numerous biodiversity elements to be assessed (e.g. from microbes to sea mammals), the different indicators needed to be studied (e.g. in Europe, 56 indicators of status have been selected), and the different assessment scales to be undertaken (e.g. from local to regional sea scale), some criteria to define spatial scales and some guidance on aggregating and integrating information is needed. We have reviewed, from ecological and management perspectives, the approaches for aggregating and integrating currently available for marine status assessment in Europe and other regions of the world. Advantages and shortcomings of the different alternatives are highlighted. We provide some guidance on the steps towards defining rules for aggregation and integration of information at multiple levels of ecosystem organization, providing recommendations on when using specific rules in the assessment. A main conclusion is that any integration principle used should be ecologically-relevant, transparent and well documented, in order to make it comparable across different geographic regions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJRC.H.1-Water Resourcesen_GB
dc.format.mediumOnlineen_GB
dc.languageENGen_GB
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJRC92380en_GB
dc.titleTales from a thousand and one ways to integrate marine ecosystem components when assessing the environmental statusen_GB
dc.typeArticles in periodicals and booksen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmars.2014.00072en_GB
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.