Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Interactions between reactive nitrogen and the Canadian landscape: a budget approach|
|Authors:||CLAIR Thomas A; PELLETIER NATHANIEL; BITTMAN Shabtai; LEIP Adrian; ARP Paul; MORAN M.d.; DENNIS Ian; NIEMI David; STERLING Shannon; DRURY Craig; YANG J.|
|Citation:||GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES vol. 28 no. 11 p. 1343-1357|
|Publisher:||AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||The movement of excess reactive nitrogen (Nr) from anthropogenic activities to natural cosystems has been described as one of the most serious environmental threats facing modern ociety [Rockstrom et al., 2009]. One of the approaches for tracking this movement is the use of budgets that quantify fluxes [Leip et al., 2011a]. We constructed an Nr budget for Canada using measured and modeled values from the scientific literature, government databases, and data from new agri-environmental indicators, in order to produce information for policy makers and scientists to understand the major flows of nitrogen to allow abetter assessment of risks to the Canadian environment. We divided the Canadian territory south of N into areas dominated by natural ecosystems, as well as by agricultural and urban/industrial activities to evaluate Nr flows within, between and out of these units. We show that Canada is a major exporter of Nrdue to the availability of inexpensive commercial fertilizers. The large land area suitable for agriculture makes Canada a significant agricultural Nr exporter of both grain crops and livestock. Finally, Canada exports petroleum Nr mainly to the United States. Because of its location and prevailing atmospheric transport patterns, Canada is a net receptor of Nr air pollution from the United States, receiving approximately 20% of the Nr leaving the US airshed. We found that overall, terrestrial natural ecosystems as well as the atmosphere are in balance between Nr inputs and outputs when all N reactive and non-reactive fluxes are included. However, when only reactive forms are considered, almost 50% of N entering the Canadian atmosphere cannot be accounted for and is assumed to be lost to the Atlantic and Arctic oceans or to unmeasured dry deposition. However, agricultural and freshwater landscapes are showing large differences between measured inputs and outputs of Nras our data suggest that denitrification in soils and aquatic systems is larger than what models predict. Our work also shows that Canada is a major contributor to the global flowof nitrogen through commercial exports.|
|JRC Directorate:||Sustainable Resources|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.