Title: Climate change impact and potential adaptation strategies under alternate realizations of climate scenarios for three major crops in Europe
Authors: DONATELLI MarcelloSRIVASTAVA Amit KumarDUVEILLER BOGDAN GRÉGORY HENRY ENIEMEYER StefanFUMAGALLI DAVIDE
Citation: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS vol. 10 no. 7 p. 075005
Publisher: IOP PUBLISHING LTD
Publication Year: 2015
JRC N°: JRC96397
ISSN: 1748-9326
URI: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/10/7/075005/
http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC96397
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075005
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: This study presents estimate of the effects of climate variables and CO2 on three major crops namely wheat, rapeseed, and sunflower in EU27 Member States. We also investigated some technical adaptation options which could offset climate change impacts. The time-slices 2000, 2020 and 2030 were chosen to represent the baseline and future climate respectively. Furthermore, two realizations within the A1B emission scenario proposed by the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES), from the ECHAM5 and HadCM3 GCM, were selected. Time series of 30 years for each GCM and time slice were used as input weather data for simulation. The time series were generated with a stochastic weather generator trained over GCM-RCM time series (downscaled simulations from the ENSEMBLES project which were statistically bias-corrected prior to the use of the weather generator). GCM-RCM simulations differed primarily for rainfall patterns across Europe, whereas the temperature increase was similar in the time horizons considered. Simulations based on the model CropSyst v. 3 were used to estimate crop responses; CropSyst was re-implemented in the modelling framework BioMA. The results presented in this paper refer to abstraction of crop growth with respect to its production system, and consider growth as limited by weather and soil water, and responding to CO2 concentrations; pests, diseases, and nutrients limitations were not accounted for in simulations. The results show primarily that different realization of the emission scenario lead to noticeably different crop performance projections in the same time slice. Simple adaptation techniques such as changing sowing dates and the use of different varieties, the latter in terms of duration of the crop cycle, may be effective in alleviating the adverse effects of climate change in most areas, although response to best adaptation (within the techniques tested) differed across crops. Although a negative impact of climate scenarios is evident in most areas, the combination of rainfall patterns and increased photosynthesis efficiency due to CO2 concentrations showed possible improvements of production patterns in some areas, including Southern Europe. The uncertainty deriving from GCM realizations with respect to rainfall suggests that articulated and detailed testing of adaptation techniques would be redundant. Using ensemble simulation would allow identifying the areas where adaptation, like those simulated, may be run autonomously by farmers, hence not requiring specific intervention in terms of support policies.
JRC Directorate:Sustainable Resources

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.