Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Characterization of raw materials based on supply risk indicators for Europe|
|Authors:||MANCINI LUCIA; BENINI LORENZO; SALA SERENELLA|
|Citation:||INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT vol. 23 no. 3 p. 726-738|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Purpose. The concept of “resource criticality” has recently emerged as a policy priority and research subject, usually referred to the risk of supply disruption for mineral resources, due to economic and geopolitical reasons. Different methodologies for assessing Critical Raw Materials (CRM) have been developed in governmental and research contexts, and the possibility of including the resource security aspect in a supply chain analysis and in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been claimed by different authors. The present paper aims at integrating CRM considerations in LCA in order to address socio-economic and strategic aspects related to resource use. Material and methods In this paper we first explore how resource criticality could be interpreted, taking into account a wider perspective and a multidimensional concept. This includes the consideration of environmental and depletion aspects, in addition to the dominant interpretation, based on economic and geopolitical considerations. We then focus on the economic dimension of the resource criticality and propose the integration of this aspect in LCA through the use of characterization factors (CF) based on the supply risk factors developed by the EU study on CRM. Four different methodological options for resource security CFs are tested in the impact assessment of fifty products. These options include: supply risk factors as such; two exponential functions of the supply risk factors, aimed at increasing the variability of the dataset; the ratio between supply risk and production data, which reflect the size of the market, giving more importance to the materials used in small amounts in products and applications, like, e.g., specialty metals, that are often perceived as critical. Results and Conclusion The results show how the impact depends on the supply risk factors or on the mass content, depending on the algorithm used. Even if there is no objective way to establish how much importance should be given to one aspect or the other, we conclude that the use of the factors “supply risk/production” produces results that might better reflect the results of EU study on CRM, and therefore could be used in LCA for an assessment of resource security impact at EU level. Applying an exponent to the supply risk factors the values are spread on a wider range and it is possible to spot the CRM among the resources within an inventory. The choice of the indicator is based rather on how important is the need of identifying a CRM in the inventory, e.g. in order to: optimize CRM use; exploring substitution options; and enhancing recovery in waste management.|
|JRC Directorate:||Sustainable Resources|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.