Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Social Sustainability in Trade and Development Policy|
|Authors:||PELLETIER NATHANIEL; USTAOGLU EDA; BENOIT CATHERINE; NORRIS GREGORY; ROSENBAUM ECKEHARD; VASTA ALESSANDRO; SALA SERENELLA|
|Citation:||INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT vol. 23 no. 3 p. 629-639|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Purpose. Social sustainability may be assessed or measured using methods and indicators, such as the social footprint, social impact assessment or wellbeing indices. The UNEP guidelines on social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) present key elements to consider for product-level, life cycle-based social sustainability assessment. This includes guidance for the goal and scope definition, inventory, impact assessment and interpretation phases of S-LCA. Methods for and studies of the broader scale, life cycle social dimensions of production and consumption are largely unavailable to date. The study assesses social risks associated with trade for EU Member States. Material and methods Social risk refers to the potential for one or more parties to be exposed to negative social conditions that, in turn, undermine social sustainability. In order to shed light on these risks, a macro-scale analysis of the social risk profile of trade-based consumption in the EU-27 has been conducted by combining intra- and extra-territorial import statistics with country and sector-specific social risk indicator data derived from the Social Hotspots Database. These data cover 17 social themes in five thematic areas. The apparent social risk profiles of EU-27 imports have then been assessed based on consideration of country-of-origin social risk data as compared to a life cycle-based social risk assessment which also took into account the distribution of social risk along product supply chains. The intention was to better understand how and to what extent current trade-based consumption in the EU-27 may be associated with socially unsustainable conditions domestically and abroad. Using a country of origin and a lifecycle-based approach it combines the Social Hotspots Database with trade and input/output data. Results and conclusion The analysis confirms the importance of a life cycle-based assessment of social risks. Both analyses attribute a large contribution to social risk to the Injuries and Fatalities indicator. The analysis underscores the importance of a life cycle-based approach to understanding and managing social risk in support of policies for socially sustainable development. Moreover, the methods presented herein offer a potentially powerful decision-support tool for policy makers wishing to better understand the magnitude and distribution of social risk associated with EU production and consumption patterns, the mitigation of which will contribute to socially sustainable development|
|JRC Directorate:||Sustainable Resources|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.