Three sampling methods are compared for efficiency on a number of test problems of various complexity for which analytic quadratures are available. The methods compared are Monte Carlo with pseudo-random and Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Quasi Monte Carlo method with sampling based on Sobol’ sequences. Generally, results show superior performance of the Quasi Monte Carlo approach based on Sobol’ sequences in line with theoretical predictions. There are also some types of functions for which Latin Hypercube Sampling can be more efficient than the Monte Carlo method. For the same functions types it can be more efficient than the Quasi Monte Carlo method at small number of sampled points.
KUCHERENKO Sergei;
ALBRECHT Daniel;
SALTELLI Andrea;
2015-12-16
arXiv - University of Cornell (USA)
JRC98050
http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02350,
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC98050,
| Name | Country | City | Type |
|---|
This document is only visible at the Commission level.
You are not authorized to publish or distribute it outside the European Commission.
This is a public document. You can share this publication.
Datasets
| ID | Title | Public URL |
|---|
Dataset collections
| ID | Acronym | Title | Public URL |
|---|
Scripts / source codes
| Description | Public URL |
|---|
Additional supporting files
| File name | Description | File type |
|---|