An official website of the European Union How do you know?      
European Commission logo
JRC Publications Repository Menu

Pro-inflammatory effects of pyrogenic and precipitated amorphous silica nanoparticles in innate immunity cells

cover
Amorphous Silica NanoParticles (ASNP) can be synthetized via several processes, two of which are the thermal route (to yield pyrogenic silica) or the wet route from a solution containing silicate salts (to obtain precipitated, colloidal or mesoporous silica). Both methods of synthesis lead to ASNP that are applied as food additive (E551). Current food regulation does not require that production methods of additives are indicated on the product label, and, thus, the ASNP are listed without mentioning the production method. Recent results indicate, however, that pyrogenic ASNP are more cytotoxic than ASNP synthetized through the wet route. The present study was aimed at clarifying if two representative preparations of ASNP, NM-203 (pyrogenic) and NM-200 (precipitated), of comparable size, specific surface area, surface charge and hydrodynamic radius in complete growth medium, had different effects on two murine macrophage cell lines (MH-S and RAW264.7 cells). Our results show that, when incubated in protein-rich fluids, NM-203 adsorbed on their surface more proteins than precipitated NM-200 and, once incubated with macrophages, elicited a greater oxidative stress, assessed from Hmox1 induction and ROS production. Flow cytometry and helium ion microscopy indicated that pyrogenic NM-203 interacted with macrophages more strongly than the precipitated NM-200 and triggered a more evident inflammatory response, evaluated with Nos2 induction, NO production, and the secretion of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β. Moreover, both ASNP synergized macrophage activation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), with a higher effect observed for NM-203. In conclusion, the results presented here demonstrate that, compared to precipitated, pyrogenic ASNP exhibit enhanced interaction with serum proteins and cell membrane, and cause a larger oxidative stress and stronger pro-inflammatory effects in macrophages. Therefore, these two nanomaterials should not be considered biologically equivalent.
2015-12-21
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
JRC98514
1096-6080,   
http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/content/150/1/40,    https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC98514,   
10.1093/toxsci/kfv258,   
Language Citation
NameCountryCityType
Datasets
IDTitlePublic URL
Dataset collections
IDAcronymTitlePublic URL
Scripts / source codes
DescriptionPublic URL
Additional supporting files
File nameDescriptionFile type 
Show metadata record  Copy citation url to clipboard  Download BibTeX
Items published in the JRC Publications Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Additional information: https://ec.europa.eu/info/legal-notice_en#copyright-notice