Title: Systematic review on women's values and preferences concerning breast cancer screening and diagnostic services
Authors: MATHIOUDAKIS ALEXANDERSALAKARI MINNAPYLKKANEN LIISASAZ PARKINSON ZULEIKA ESTHERBRAMESFELD ANKEDEANDREA SILVIALERDA DONATANEAMTIU LUCIANAPARDO-HERNANDEZ HECTORSOLÀ IVANALONSO-COELLO PABLO
Citation: PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY vol. 28 no. 5 p. 939-947
Publisher: WILEY
Publication Year: 2019
JRC N°: JRC111343
ISSN: 1057-9249 (online)
URI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pon.5041
http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC111343
DOI: 10.1002/pon.5041
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: Background: There is still lack of consensus on the benefit‐harm balance of breast cancer screening. In this scenario, women's values and preferences are crucial for developing health‐related recommendations. In the context of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer, we conducted a systematic review to inform the European Breast Guidelines. Methods: We searched Medline and included primary studies assessing women's values and preferences regarding breast cancer screening and diagnosis decision making. We used a thematic approach to synthesise relevant data. The quality of evidence was determined with GRADE, including GRADE CERQual for qualitative research. Results: We included 22 individual studies. Women were willing to accept the psychological and physical burden of breast cancer screening and a significant risk of overdiagnosis and false‐positive mammography findings, in return for the benefit of earlier diagnosis. The anxiety engendered by the delay in getting results of diagnostic tests was highlighted as a significant burden, emphasising the need for rapid and efficient screening services, and clear and efficient communication. The confidence in the findings was low to moderate for screening and moderate for diagnosis, predominantly because of methodological limitations, lack of adequate understanding of the outcomes by participants, and indirectness. Conclusions: Women value more the possibility of an earlier diagnosis over the risks of a false‐positive result or overdiagnosis. Concerns remain that women may not understand the concept of overdiagnosis. Women highly value time efficient screening processes and rapid result delivery and will accept some discomfort for the peace of mind screening may provide.
JRC Directorate:Health, Consumers and Reference Materials

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.