Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES vol. 66 no. 2 p. 134-156||en_GB|
|dc.description.abstract||Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) undermines tax revenues collection and raises public discontent in times when the tax burden has increased significantly for households in most developed economies. In addition, new forms of profit shifting related to intangible investment have emerged rapidly along the traditional use of transfer pricing and debt shifting by multinational companies. In this paper, using worldwide company level data for the period 2004-2013, we demonstrate that the sectoral differences in profit shifting are a serious concern from a welfare and policy perspectives. Sectors performing more profit shifting lower their average cost of capital and are thus able to attract more investment to the detriment of sectors less able to dodge taxes. We develop a multilevel model and provide indirect evidence of the welfare costs caused by profit shifting by estimating the cross-sectoral variance of semi-elasticity of declared profit. We also demonstrate that having a larger share of intangible assets is not per se related to more profit shifting and that it may point instead to cross-sectoral differences. Finally, we detect almost no financial shifting and find that the largest part of profit shifting is done by means of transfer pricing.||en_GB|
|dc.description.sponsorship||JRC.B.2-Fiscal Policy Analysis||en_GB|
|dc.publisher||OXFORD UNIV PRESS||en_GB|
|dc.title||Profit shifting and industrial heterogeneity||en_GB|
|dc.type||Articles in periodicals and books||en_GB|
|JRC Directorate:||Growth and Innovation|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.