Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project|
|Authors:||MANSOURI Kamel; ABDELAZIZ Ahmed; RYBACKA Aleksandra; RONCAGLIONI Alessandra; TROPSHA Alexander; VARNEK Alexandre; ZAKHAROV Alexey; WORTH Andrew; RICHARD Ann; GRULKE Christopher; TRISCIUZZI Daniela; FOURCHES Denis; HORVATH Dragos; BENFENATI Emilio; MURATOV Eugene; EVA Wedebye; GRISONI Francesca; MANGIATORDI Giuseppe; INCISIVO Giuseppina; HONG Huixiao; NG Hui; TETKO Igor; BALABIN Ilya; KANCHERLA Jayaram; SHEN Jie; BURTON JULIEN; NICKLAUS Marc; CASSOTTI Matteo; NIKOLOV Nikolai; NICOLOTTI Orazio; ANDERSSON Patrik; ZANG Qingda; POLITI Regina; BEGER Richard D.; TODESCHINI Roberto; HUANG Ruili; FARAG Sherif; ROSENBERG Sine; SLAVOV Svetoslav; HU Xin; JUDSON Richard|
|Citation:||ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES vol. 124 no. 7 p. 1023-1033|
|Publisher:||US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE|
|Type:||Articles in periodicals and books|
|Abstract:||Background: Humans are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment. Some chemicals mimic natural endocrine hormones and, thus, have the potential to be endocrine disruptors. Most of these chemicals have never been tested for their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER). Risk assessors need tools to prioritize chemicals for evaluation in costly in vivo tests, for instance, within the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Objectives: We describe a large-scale modeling project called CERAPP (Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project) and demonstrate the efficacy of using predictive computational models trained on high-throughput screening data to evaluate thousands of chemicals for ER-related activity and prioritize them for further testing. Methods: CERAPP combined multiple models developed in collaboration with 17 groups in the United States and Europe to predict ER activity of a common set of 32,464 chemical structures. Quantitative structure–activity relationship models and docking approaches were employed, mostly using a common training set of 1,677 chemical structures provided by the U.S. EPA, to build a total of 40 categorical and 8 continuous models for binding, agonist, and antagonist ER activity. All predictions were evaluated on a set of 7,522 chemicals curated from the literature. To overcome the limitations of single models, a consensus was built by weighting models on scores based on their evaluated accuracies. Results: Individual model scores ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, showing high prediction reliabilities. Out of the 32,464 chemicals, the consensus model predicted 4,001 chemicals (12.3%) as high priority actives and 6,742 potential actives (20.8%) to be considered for further testing. Conclusion: This project demonstrated the possibility to screen large libraries of chemicals using a consensus of different in silico approaches. This concept will be applied in future projects related to other end points.|
|JRC Directorate:||Health, Consumers and Reference Materials|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.