Title: CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project
Authors: MANSOURI KamelABDELAZIZ AhmedRYBACKA AleksandraRONCAGLIONI AlessandraTROPSHA AlexanderVARNEK AlexandreZAKHAROV AlexeyWORTH AndrewRICHARD AnnGRULKE ChristopherTRISCIUZZI DanielaFOURCHES DenisHORVATH DragosBENFENATI EmilioMURATOV EugeneEVA WedebyeGRISONI FrancescaMANGIATORDI GiuseppeINCISIVO GiuseppinaHONG HuixiaoNG HuiTETKO IgorBALABIN IlyaKANCHERLA JayaramSHEN JieBURTON JULIENNICKLAUS MarcCASSOTTI MatteoNIKOLOV NikolaiNICOLOTTI OrazioANDERSSON PatrikZANG QingdaPOLITI ReginaBEGER Richard D.TODESCHINI RobertoHUANG RuiliFARAG SherifROSENBERG SineSLAVOV SvetoslavHU XinJUDSON Richard
Citation: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES vol. 124 no. 7 p. 1023-1033
Publisher: US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
Publication Year: 2016
JRC N°: JRC95481
ISSN: 0091-6765
URI: http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/15-10267/
http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC95481
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510267
Type: Articles in periodicals and books
Abstract: Background: Humans are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment. Some chemicals mimic natural endocrine hormones and, thus, have the potential to be endocrine disruptors. Most of these chemicals have never been tested for their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER). Risk assessors need tools to prioritize chemicals for evaluation in costly in vivo tests, for instance, within the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Objectives: We describe a large-scale modeling project called CERAPP (Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project) and demonstrate the efficacy of using predictive computational models trained on high-throughput screening data to evaluate thousands of chemicals for ER-related activity and prioritize them for further testing. Methods: CERAPP combined multiple models developed in collaboration with 17 groups in the United States and Europe to predict ER activity of a common set of 32,464 chemical structures. Quantitative structure–activity relationship models and docking approaches were employed, mostly using a common training set of 1,677 chemical structures provided by the U.S. EPA, to build a total of 40 categorical and 8 continuous models for binding, agonist, and antagonist ER activity. All predictions were evaluated on a set of 7,522 chemicals curated from the literature. To overcome the limitations of single models, a consensus was built by weighting models on scores based on their evaluated accuracies. Results: Individual model scores ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, showing high prediction reliabilities. Out of the 32,464 chemicals, the consensus model predicted 4,001 chemicals (12.3%) as high priority actives and 6,742 potential actives (20.8%) to be considered for further testing. Conclusion: This project demonstrated the possibility to screen large libraries of chemicals using a consensus of different in silico approaches. This concept will be applied in future projects related to other end points.
JRC Directorate:Health, Consumers and Reference Materials

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.